Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Physics

ISSN 1817-3020 (Print)
ISSN 2542-193X (Online)


For citation:

Shabunin A. V. Determining the structure of couplings in chaotic and stochastic systems using a neural network. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Physics , 2025, vol. 25, iss. 3, pp. 277-287. DOI: 10.18500/1817-3020-2025-25-3-277-287, EDN: EXCZHP

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Published online: 
29.08.2025
Full text:
(downloads: 115)
Language: 
Russian
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
517.9:621.372
EDN: 
EXCZHP

Determining the structure of couplings in chaotic and stochastic systems using a neural network

Autors: 
Shabunin Alexey Vladimirovich, Saratov State University
Abstract: 

Subject and Objectives: The purpose of this work is development and research of an algorithm for determining the structure of couplings of an ensemble of chaotic self-oscillating systems with and without noise, which is based on artificial neural networks (ANN). Ensembles of two cubic maps with diffusive unidirectional and mutual couplings are the systems under study. Materials and Methods: The method is based on the determination of causality by Granger and the use of direct propagation artificial neural networks trained with regularization. Results: The applicability of the algorithm has been considered both for a strictly deterministic system and for a system with low-intensity additive Gaussian noise. The results have shown the possibility of using ANN to identify the degree of influence of the subsystems on each other, as well as to assess the magnitude of the coupling coefficients. At the same time, low-intensity noise demonstrates a minor effect on the measurement results. Moreover, noise can play a constructive role, allowing to determine the connectivity in the cases where measurements become impossible in “pure” systems, for example, in the chaos synchronization mode or in the case of regular modes. Discussion and Conclusions: Although the method has shown its effectiveness for simple mathematical models, its applicability for real systems depends on a number of factors, such as sensitivity to external noise, distortion of the waveforms, the dimension of the array etc. These questions require additional research.

Reference: 
  1. Granger C. W. J. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross- spectral methods. Econometrica, 1969, vol. 37, iss. 3, pp. 424–438. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912791
  2. Granger C. W. J. Testing for causality. A personal view-point. J. Economic Dynamics and Control, 1980, vol. 2, pp. 329–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1889(80)90069-X
  3. Sysoev I. V. Diagnostika svyazannosti po khaoticheskim signalam nelineinykh system: reshenie obratnykh zadach [Diagnostics of connectivity by chaotic signals of nonlinear systems: Solving reverse problems]. Saratov, Izdatel’stvo “Kubik”, 2019. 46 p. (in Russian).
  4. Hesse R., Molle E., Arnold M., Schack B. The use of time-variant EEG Granger causality for inspecting directed interdependencies of neural assemblies. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 2003, vol. 124, iss. 1, pp. 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0270(02)00366-7
  5. Bezruchko B. P., Ponomarenko V. I., Prohorov M. D., Smirnov D. A., Tass P. A. Modeling nonlinear oscillatory systems and diagnostics of coupling between them using chaotic time series analysis: Applications in neurophysiology. Physics – Uspekhi, 2008, vol. 51, iss. 3, pp. 304–310. https://doi.org/10.1070/pu2008v051n03abeh006494
  6. Mokhov I. I., Smirnov D. A. Diagnostics of a cause-effect relation between solar activity and the Earth’s global surface temperature. Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics, 2008, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433808030018
  7. Mokhov I. I., Smirnov D. A. Empirical estimates of the influence of natural and anthropogenic factors on the global surface temperature. Doklady Earth Sciences, 2009, vol. 427, no. 1, pp. 798–803. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X09050201
  8. Sysoev I. V., Karavaev A. S., Nakonechny P. I. Role of model nonlinearity for Granger causality based coupling estimation for pathological tremor. Izvestiya VUZ. Applied Nonlinear Dynamics, 2010, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 81–90. https://doi.org/10.18500/0869-6632-2010-18-4-81-90
  9. Sysoeva M. V., Sysoev I. V. Mathematical modeling of encephalogram dynamics during epileptic seizure. Technical Physics Letters, 2012, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 151–154. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063785012020137
  10. Sysoev I. V., Sysoeva M. V. Detecting changes in coupling with Granger causality method from time series with fast transient processes. Physica D, 2015, vol. 309, pp. 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2015.07.005
  11. Chen Y., Rangarajan G., Feng J., Ding M. Analyzing multiple nonlinear time series with extended Granger causality. Physics Letters A, 2004, vol. 324, no. 1, pp. 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2004.02.032
  12. Marinazzo D., Pellicoro M., Stramaglia S. Nonlinear parametric model for Granger causality of time series. Physical Review E, 2006, vol. 73, iss. 6, pt. 2, art. 066216. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.73.066216
  13. Kornilov М., Sysoev I. Recovering the architecture of links in a chain of three unidirectionally coupled systems using the Granger-causality test. Technical Physics Letters, 2018, vol. 44, iss. 5, pp. 445–449. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063785018050206
  14. Grishchenko A. A., van Rijn C. M., Sysoev I. V. Methods for statistical evaluation of connectivity estimates in epileptic Brain. Journal of Biological Systems, 2023, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218339023500237
  15. Haykin S. Neural Networks. A Comprehensive Foundation. New Jersey, Prentice Hall, 1999. 842 p.
  16. Galushkin A. I. Neyronnye seti: osnovy teorii [Neural Networks: Fundamentals of Theory]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo “Goryachaya Liniya – Telekom”, 2012. 496 p. (in Russian).
  17. Kulkarni D. R., Parikh J. C., Pandya A. S. Dynamic predictions from time series data – an artificial neural network approach. International Journal of Modern Physics C, 1997, vol. 8, no. 06, pp. 1345–1360. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129183197001193
  18. de Oliveira K. A., Vannucci A., Da Silva E. C. Using artificial neural networks to forecast chaotic time series. Physica A, 2000, vol. 284, iss. 1–4, pp. 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(00)00215
  19. Antipov O. I., Neganov V. A. Neural network prediction and fractal analysis of the chaotic processes in discrete nonlinear systems. Doklady Physics, 2011, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 7–9. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028335811010034
  20. Shabunin A. V. Neural network as a predictor of discrete map dynamics. Izvestiya VUZ. Applied Nonlinear Dynamics, 2014, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 58–72. https://doi.org/10.18500/0869-6632-2014-22-5-58-72
  21. Tank A., Covert I., Foti N., Shojaie A., Fox E. Neural granger causality for nonlinear time series. URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1802.05842v1 (accessed September 20, 2024).
  22. Tihonov A. N. On incorrect linear algebra problems and a stable solution method. Doclady Akademii nauk SSSR, 1965, vol. 163, no. 3, pp. 591–594 (in Russian).
  23. Shabunin A. V. Searching the structure of couplings in a chaotic maps ensemble by means of neural networks. Izvestiya VUZ. Applied Nonlinear Dynamics, 2024, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 636–653. https://doi.org/10.18500/0869-6632-003111
  24. Fujisaka H., Yamada T. Stability theory of synchronized motion in coupled-oscillator systems. Progress of Theoretical Physics, 1983, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 32–47. https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.69.32
  25. Fujisaka H., Yamada T. Stability theory of synchronized motion in coupled-oscillator systems. The mapping approach. Progress of Theoretical Physics, 1983, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 1240–1248. https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.70.1240
  26. Astakhov V., Shabunin A., Klimshin A., Anishchenko V. In-phase and antiphase complete chaotic synchronization in symmetrically coupled discrete maps. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2002, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1155/S1026022602000250
Received: 
26.03.2025
Accepted: 
15.05.2025
Published: 
29.08.2025