Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Physics

ISSN 1817-3020 (Print)
ISSN 2542-193X (Online)


For citation:

Prikhozhdenko E. S. Development and optimization of electrospun polyamide-6 nonwoven substrate for surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Physics , 2026, vol. 26, iss. 1, pp. 102-111. DOI: 10.18500/1817-3020-2026-26-1-102-111, EDN: UWNOHY

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Published online: 
31.03.2026
Full text:
(downloads: 17)
Language: 
Russian
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
543.424.2:621.793.1:677.494.675
EDN: 
UWNOHY

Development and optimization of electrospun polyamide-6 nonwoven substrate for surface-enhanced Raman scattering

Autors: 
Prikhozhdenko Ekaterina Sergeevna, Saratov State University
Abstract: 

Background and Objectives: Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) has emerged as a powerful analytical technique for ultrasensitive molecular detection, finding applications in biomedical diagnostics, environmental monitoring, and food safety. However, the widespread adoption of SERS is limited by the need for reproducible, cost-effective substrates with high enhancement factors. While various nanostructured platforms have been explored, polymer-based substrates decorated with noble metals offer unique advantages including flexibility, tunable morphology, and scalability. This study focuses on developing and optimizing SERS-active substrates using electrospun polyamide-6 (PA-6) nonwoven materials coated with gold via vacuum sputtering. The primary objectives were to: (i) systematically investigate the effect of gold deposition time (1–8 min) on substrate morphology and SERS performance; (ii) determine the optimal sputtering parameters for maximum signal enhancement; (iii) evaluate substrate reproducibility using statistical analysis of large-area SERS mapping data. Materials and Methods: PA-6 nonwoven substrates were produced by electrospinning from formic/acetic acid solution (1 : 1 ratio, 15 mass.%). Gold was deposited via magnetron sputtering at constant current (25 mA) with varying times (1–8 min). For reproducibility tests, patterned substrates were created using a mask with a 3×3 mm square holes. 4-mercaptobenzoic acid (4-MBA, 10−5 M in ethanol) was used as analyte. The reference Raman spectra were obtained from 4-MBA (10−3 M) on uncoated PA-6. 2500 SERS spectra/substrate (50×50 spectra, 8 substrates) were collected for substrates optimization. In reproducibility study, 22500 total SERS spectra were analyzed (3 substrates × 3 areas × 3 maps with 50× ×50 spectra/map). Results: SEM has revealed improved gold coverage uniformity at longer deposition times (6–8 min). Shorter times (2–4 min) have shown discontinuous coatings with defects. Principal component analysis (PCA, PC1 explained variance: 54.3%) has identified optimal performance at 8 min Au deposition. Maximum EF (8 min): (7.70±1.02) · 104 at 1073 cm−1. Characteristic 4-MBA peaks (1073, 1581 cm−1) have shown consistent enhancement profiles. Triplicate substrates have shown average EF = (7.71 ± 1.84) · 104 with relative standard deviation of 23.9% across all measurements. Conclusion: This study has demonstrated that vacuum-sputtered gold on electrospun PA-6 materials produces effective SERS substrates with enhancement factors >104. The 8-minute deposition time has yielded optimal performance, balancing coating uniformity with enhancement capability. While the substrates show promise for practical applications, the observed ∼24% signal variability suggests opportunities for further optimization. The developed substrates combine the advantages of polymer flexibility with metal-enhanced sensitivity, offering a viable platform for various SERS applications. 

Acknowledgments: 
This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (project No. 22-79-10270, https://rscf.ru/project/22-79-10270/). The author thanks Vsevolod Atkin for the SEM measurements.
Reference: 
  1. Nie S., Emory S. R. Probing single molecules and single nanoparticles by surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Science, 1997, vol. 275, no. 5303, pp. 1102–1106. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5303.1102
  2. Kneipp K., Wang Y., Kneipp H., Perelman L. T., Itzkan I., Dasari R. R., Feld M. S. Single molecule detection using surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS). Phys. Rev. Lett., 1997, vol. 78, pp. 1667–1670. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1667
  3. Chen Q., Wang J., Yao F., Zhang W., Qi X., Gao X., Liu Y., Wang J., Zou M., Liang P. A review of recent progress in the application of Raman spectroscopy and SERS detection of microplastics and derivatives. Microchimica Acta, 2023, vol. 190, art. 465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-023-06044-y
  4. Kaushik A., Singh J., Soni R., Singh J. P. MoS2–Ag nanocomposite-based SERS substrates with an ultralow detection limit. ACS Appl. Nano Mater., 2023, vol. 6, iss. 11, pp. 9236–9246. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.3c00813
  5. Itoh T., Procházka M., Dong Z. C., Ji W., Yamamoto Y. S., Zhang Y., Ozaki Y. Toward a new era of SERS and TERS at the nanometer scale: From fundamentals to innovative applications. Chem. Rev., 2023, vol. 123, iss. 4, pp. 1552–1634. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00316
  6. Chaudhry I., Hu G., Ye H., Jensen L. Toward modeling the complexity of the chemical mechanism in SERS. ACS Nano, 2024, vol. 18, iss. 32, pp. 20835–20850. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.4c07198
  7. Fleischmann M., Hendra P. J., McQuillan A. J. Raman spectra of pyridine adsorbed at a silver electrode. Chem. Phys. Lett., 1974, vol. 26, iss. 2, pp. 163–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(74)85388-1
  8. Jeanmaire D. L., Van Duyne R. P. Surface raman spectroelectrochemistry: Part I. Heterocyclic, aromatic, and aliphatic amines adsorbed on the anodized silver electrode. J. Electroanal. Chem., 1977, vol. 84, iss. 1, pp. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0728(77)80224-6
  9. Albrecht M. G., Creighton J. A. Anomalously intense Raman spectra of pyridine at a silver electrode. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1977, vol. 99, iss. 15, pp. 5215–5217. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00457a071
  10. Sultangaziyev A., Ilyas A., Dyussupova A., Bukasov R. Trends in application of SERS substrates beyond Ag and Au, and their role in bioanalysis. Biosensors, 2022, vol. 12, iss. 11, art. 967. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12110967
  11. Tahir M. A., Dina N. E., Cheng H., Valev V. K., Zhang L. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for bioanalysis and diagnosis. Nanoscale, 2021, vol. 13, iss. 27, pp. 11593–11634. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1NR00708D
  12. Li J. Q., Dukes P. V., Lee W., Sarkis M., Vo-Dinh T. Machine learning using convolutional neural networks for SERS analysis of biomarkers in medical diagnostics. J. Raman Spectrosc., 2022, vol. 53, no. 12, pp. 2044–2057. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.6447
  13. Liu X., Guo J., Li Y., Wang B., Yang S., Chen W., Wu X., Guo J., Ma X. SERS substrate fabrication for biochemical sensing: Towards point-of-care diagnostics. J. Mater. Chem. B, 2021, vol. 9, iss. 40, pp. 8378–8388. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TB01299A
  14. Yang J., Chen X., Luo C., Li Z., Chen C., Han S., Lv X., Wu L., Chen C. Application of serum SERS technology combined with deep learning algorithm in the rapid diagnosis of immune diseases and chronic kidney disease. Sci. Rep., 2023, vol. 13, no. 1, art. 15719. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42719-5
  15. Lyu N., Hassanzadeh-Barforoushi A., Rey Gomez L. M., Zhang W., Wang Y. SERS biosensors for liquid biopsy towards cancer diagnosis by detection of various circulating biomarkers: Current progress and perspectives. Nano Converg., 2024, vol. 11, art. 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40580-024-00428-3
  16. Cheng H., Chen R., Zhan Y., Dong W., Chen Q., Wang Y., Zhou P., Gao S., Huang W., Li L., Feng J. Novel ratiometric surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) biosensor for ultrasensitive quantitative monitoring of human carboxylesterase-1 in hepatocellular carcinoma cells using Ag–Au nanoflowers as SERS substrate. Anal. Chem., 2024, vol. 96, iss. 46, pp. 18555–18563. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c04763
  17. Oliveira D., Carneiro M. C. C. G., Moreira F. T. C. SERS biosensor with plastic antibodies for detection of a cancer biomarker protein. Microchim. Acta, 2024, vol. 191, art. 238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-024-06327-y
  18. Du Z., Qi Y., He J., Zhong D., Zhou M. Recent advances in applications of nanoparticles in SERS in vivo imaging. WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology, 2021, vol. 13, iss. 2, art. e1672. https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.1672
  19. Bagheri P., Eremina O. E., Fernando A., Kamal M., Stegis I., Vazquez C., Shishido S. N., Kuhn P., Zavaleta C. A Systematic Approach toward Enabling Maximal Targeting Efficiency of Cell Surface Proteins with Actively Targeted SERS Nanoparticles. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2024, vol. 16, iss. 13, pp. 15847–15860. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c18959
  20. Berge M., Dowek A., Prognon P., Legrand F. X., Tfayli A., Lê L. M. M., Caudron E. Optimization of experimental conditions by surface enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS) spectroscopy with gold nanoparticles suspensions. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc., 2022, vol. 268, art. 120628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2021.120628
  21. Yang Q., Sun D.-W., Pu H. Porous materials nanohybridized with metal nanoparticles as substrates for enhancing SERS detection in food safety applications. Trends Food Sci. Technol., 2023, vol. 141, art. 104202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2023.104202
  22. Feizpour M., Liu Q., Van der Donck T., Thienpont H., Meulebroeck W., Ottevaere H. Characterizing planar SERS substrates: Unraveling the link between physical characteristics and performance metrics. J. Phys. Photonics, 2024, vol. 6, iss. 2, art. 025002. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7647/ad2528
  23. Jin J., Guo Z., Fan D., Zhao B. Spotting the driving forces for SERS of two-dimensional nanomaterials. Mater. Horizons., 2023, vol. 10, iss. 4, pp. 1087–1104. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2MH01241C
  24. Liu Y., Qin Z., Deng J., Zhou J., Jia X., Wang G., Luo F. The Advanced Applications of 2D Materials in SERS. Chemosensors, 2022, vol. 10, iss. 11, art. 455. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors10110455
  25. Prikhozhdenko E. S., Bratashov D. N., Gorin D. A., Yashchenok A. M. Flexible surface-enhanced Raman scattering-active substrates based on nanofibrous membranes. Nano Res., 2018, vol. 11, pp. 4468–4488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-018-2064-2
  26. Wang L., Wang X., Cheng L., Ding S., Wang G., Choo J., Chen L. SERS-based test strips: Principles, designs and applications. Biosens. Bioelectron., 2021, vol. 189, art. 113360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2021.113360
  27. Sheng E., Lu Y., Xiao Y., Li Z., Wang H., Dai Z. Simultaneous and ultrasensitive detection of three pesticides using a surface-enhanced Raman scattering-based lateral flow assay test strip. Biosens. Bioelectron., 2021, vol. 181, art. 113149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2021.113149
  28. Soden D., Taqy S., Ghosh K., Haque A. A tunable approach to fabricate cost-effective SERS substrates using Au nanoparticles by sputtering deposition. Bull. Mater. Sci., 2025, vol. 48, art. 30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-024-03395-x
  29. Nguyen T. H. T., Nguyen T. M. A., Sai C. D., Le T. H. Y., Tran T. N. A., Bach T. C., Le V. V., Pham N. H., Ngac A. B., Nguyen V. T., Tran T. H., Chi T. H. K. Efficient surface enhanced Raman scattering substrates based on complex gold nanostructures formed by annealing sputtered gold thin films. Opt. Mater., 2021, vol. 121, art. 111488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2021.111488
  30. Metwally B. S., Zayed A. M., Rashed S. A., El-Sheikh M. N., Hamouda A. S. Sustainable nano-nonwoven fabric production from recycled polyamide 6 waste via electrospinning: Controlling characteristics and comprehensive analytical study. Adv. Mater. Technol., 2023, vol. 8, iss. 18, art. 2300509. https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.202300509
  31. Mahmud M. B., Rahman S. S., Fashandi M., Lee P. C., Park C. B. Hydrophilic-to-hydrophobic conversion of polyamide 6-based mat via polyvinylidene fluoride nanofiber integration with enhanced oil-water separation. Mater. Today Sustain., 2023, vol. 24, art. 100559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtsust.2023.100559
  32. Lasenko I., Sanchaniya J. V., Kanukuntla S. P., Ladani Y., Viluma-Gudmona A., Kononova O., Lusis V., Tipans I., Selga T. The mechanical properties of nanocomposites reinforced with PA6 electrospun nanofibers. Polymers, 2023, vol. 15, iss. 3, art. 673. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15030673
  33. Yingying H., Jiangtao X., Sihang Z., Zhichao L., Dagang M., Shouxiang J. Au-coated quartz fabric by plasma treatment as a flexible SERS substrate for rapid detection of harmful substances. Microchem. J., 2024, vol. 196, art. 109700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2023.109700
  34. Wang K., Li J. Reliable SERS detection of pesticides with a large-scale self-assembled Au@4-MBA@Ag nanoparticle array. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc., 2021, vol. 263, art. 120218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2021.120218
  35. Klimova S. A., Atkin V. S., Usachev A. N., Pchelkin I. A., Presnyakov D. V., Mitin D. M., Savonin A. A., Kirillova I. V. Metallized nonwoven electrospun polyamide-6 nanofibers for energy production and storage. Fibre Chem., 2017, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 200–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10692-017-9869-8
  36. Saveleva M., Prikhozhdenko E., Gorin D., Skirtach A. G., Yashchenok A., Parakhonskiy B. Polycaprolactone-based, porous CaCO3 and Ag nanoparticle modified scaffolds as a SERS platform with moleculespecific adsorption. Front. Chem., 2020, vol. 7, art. 888. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2019.00888
  37. Pedregosa F., Varoquaux G., Gramfort A., Michel V., Thirion B., Grisel O., Blondel M., Prettenhofer P., Weiss R., Dubourg V., Vanderplas J., Passos A., Cournapeau D., Brucher M., Perrot M., Duchesnay É. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 2011, vol. 12, pp. 2825–2830. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1201.0490
  38. Ho C. H., Lee S. SERS and DFT investigation of the adsorption behavior of 4-mercaptobenzoic acid on silver colloids. Colloids Suraces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, 2015, vol. 474, pp. 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.03.004
Received: 
05.05.2025
Accepted: 
11.07.2025
Published: 
31.03.2026